Matthew 20:10

Matthew 20:10

ESV: Now when those hired first came, they thought they would receive more, but each of them also received a denarius.

KJV: But when the first came, they supposed that they should have received more; and they likewise received every man a penny.

NIV: So when those came who were hired first, they expected to receive more. But each one of them also received a denarius.

NKJV: But when the first came, they supposed that they would receive more; and they likewise received each a denarius.

NLT: When those hired first came to get their pay, they assumed they would receive more. But they, too, were paid a day's wage.

Meaning

Matthew 20:10 reveals the expectation and subsequent disappointment of the workers hired first in the vineyard parable. Having labored the longest, they anticipated a greater remuneration than the standard day's wage (a denarius), based on their effort and endurance. However, they, like all others, received only a denarius, which highlights God's unmerited favor and challenges human notions of deserving reward. The verse underscores that God's grace often supersedes human calculations of fairness and merit, provoking a test of the heart concerning envy and self-righteousness.

Cross References

Context

Matthew 20:10 is embedded within the Parable of the Workers in the Vineyard (Matt 20:1-16), following Jesus' teaching on discipleship, wealth, and sacrifice in Matthew 19. It immediately precedes His third prediction of His passion and the request of James and John's mother for positions of honor, providing a profound commentary on true greatness and reward in the Kingdom of Heaven. The parable serves as a direct response to Peter's question in Matthew 19:27, "See, we have left everything and followed you. What then will we have?" It subtly corrects a potentially meritorious expectation by contrasting human justice (equal pay for equal work) with God's divine generosity and grace. Historically, a "denarius" was a common Roman coin, typically the standard daily wage for a laboring man in Jesus' time, making the master's decision deeply unsettling to those expecting more based on their longer labor. The narrative challenges a common first-century Jewish mindset that emphasized works and adherence to the law as a means of earning divine favor, presenting a counter-narrative of God's unilateral grace.

Word analysis

• So when those came: Greek: hoi protori (οἱ πρῶτοι). This refers to "the first ones," specifically the workers hired at the very start of the day. Their being "first" implies a greater expected merit or reward based on their longevity of labor compared to later hires.
• who were hired first: This emphasizes their primary claim to being the longest workers, setting up their disappointment.
• they thought: Greek: enómisan (ἐνόμισαν), from nomízō. This word implies a settled belief, a conviction, a calculation, or a custom-based expectation. It's not just a casual guess but a firm assumption based on their human logic, a sense of what was "due" or "customary." This reveals a human perspective centered on earning and deserving.
• that they would receive more: Greek: pleíon (πλεῖον). Literally, "more" or "greater" in quantity. This denotes their expectation of a proportionally higher wage due to their greater labor input. Their focus is on quantity of work directly translating to quantity of reward, missing the qualitative nature of the owner's generosity. This highlights their reliance on a legalistic or performance-based system of reward.
• but each of them also received: Greek: allà kaì autoì élabon (ἀλλὰ καὶ αὐτοὶ ἔλαβον). The "but" (allà) introduces a strong contrast, negating their prior expectation. "Also" (kaì) emphasizes that even they, despite their long hours, received the same as everyone else, highlighting the unexpected equality. "Received" (élabon) indicates a gift or a disbursement, not a wage earned in a way that dictates a differential payment based on hours.
• a denarius: Greek: dēnárion (δηνάριον). This was the standard daily wage, confirming the master's original agreement with them (Matt 20:2). The disappointment comes from the fact that this fixed, agreed-upon amount did not increase relative to their work compared to others. It points to the singular nature of the blessing (the Kingdom, salvation) that God grants to all who respond to His call, regardless of when they come.

Commentary

Matthew 20:10 forms the pivot of the Parable of the Workers in the Vineyard. It illustrates the clash between human perception of justice and God's generous, unmerited grace. The "first" workers, by virtue of their earlier start and prolonged labor, naturally expected a greater compensation. Their expectation stemmed from a works-based mindset, a "meritocracy" where output dictates reward. This mindset is deeply human and reflects the prevailing cultural and even some religious assumptions of the time, including subtle polemics against the idea that God’s favor is earned through ritual or deed.

However, the divine economy operates differently. The payment of "a denarius" to everyone, regardless of the hours worked, symbolizes the full, abundant grace of salvation or the blessings of the Kingdom of Heaven. It's not a payment earned proportionally but a gift received fully by all who accept the call. The workers' grumbling later in the parable reveals their underlying discontent, which is rooted in envy rather than a legitimate complaint about unfairness, as they did receive what they agreed to. This verse challenges our propensity to compare ourselves with others, to demand what we feel we've "earned," and to resent God's grace to those we perceive as less "deserving" or who came to faith later. It teaches that the master's goodness to others should not diminish our gratitude for what we have received, for His grace is abundant and available to all who answer His call, whether at dawn or the eleventh hour.

Bonus section

The concept of "my eye is evil because I am good" (Matt 20:15) used by the vineyard owner, is an ancient idiom for jealousy or envy. The first workers' "thought" that they "would receive more" immediately leads to this envious attitude when their expectation isn't met and others are treated equally or even "better" from their perspective. This highlights that their primary sin wasn't injustice done to them (they got what they agreed upon), but rather a desire for another's portion or a comparison-based resentment. The parable implies that one's attitude towards another's blessings can reveal a core spiritual issue regarding gratitude and acceptance of God's sovereignty.

Explore matthew 20 images, wallpapers, art, audio, video, maps, infographics and timelines