Genesis 31:14

Genesis 31:14

ESV: Then Rachel and Leah answered and said to him, "Is there any portion or inheritance left to us in our father's house?

KJV: And Rachel and Leah answered and said unto him, Is there yet any portion or inheritance for us in our father's house?

NIV: Then Rachel and Leah replied, "Do we still have any share in the inheritance of our father's estate?

NKJV: Then Rachel and Leah answered and said to him, "Is there still any portion or inheritance for us in our father's house?

NLT: Rachel and Leah responded, "That's fine with us! We won't inherit any of our father's wealth anyway.

Meaning

Rachel and Leah declare to Jacob that Laban, their father, has withheld any rightful "portion" or "inheritance" from them, meaning they have received no financial security or material stake from his wealth. Their rhetorical question serves as an emphatic statement, confirming their unity with Jacob and their conviction that their future and prosperity lie with him, not with their exploitative father.

Cross References

Context

Genesis 31:14 occurs immediately after Jacob has secretly called Rachel and Leah to the field to disclose Laban's consistent deceit in changing his wages (Gen 31:7) and God's divine intervention, commanding him to return to the land of his fathers (Gen 31:13). This verse is Rachel and Leah's collective and affirmative response to Jacob, demonstrating their shared grievance with Laban and their complete agreement with Jacob's plan to depart. Historically and culturally, a father was expected to provide for his daughters, particularly through a dowry (mohar) for their marriage, which would secure their standing in their husband's family. While daughters typically did not inherit land, they were entitled to their personal property and the protection/security their father's household offered. Laban had not only taken the "bride-price" or "money" that was rightfully theirs and Jacob’s, but had offered no subsequent provision or "inheritance" from his own vast wealth, underscoring his exploitation and disloyalty even to his own daughters. Their affirmation solidifies their alliance with Jacob against the backdrop of Laban's long-standing manipulation.

Word analysis

• Then Rachel and Leah answered: This phrase highlights the unity and consensus between the sisters, showing they are fully aligned with Jacob's perspective and his intent to depart from Laban. Their voice is heard as a collective unit.
• and said to him: Emphasizes direct address and a conclusive statement. This is not a mere question for information but a rhetorical assertion.
• “Is there still any portion (חֵלֶק - cheleq) or inheritance (נַחֲלָה - nachalah):
  • Portion (חֵלֶק - cheleq): Refers to a divided part, share, or lot. It signifies a rightful allocation or entitlement of material possessions. Here, it denotes any personal or financial share that should have come to them from Laban's assets or dealings.
  • Inheritance (נַחֲלָה - nachalah): Denotes an inherited possession, patrimony, or heritage. While typically referring to land passing down through generations (and sons were primary inheritors), for daughters it could imply the dowry (mohar), movable goods, or any part of the paternal estate contributing to their future security. Combined with cheleq, it covers all aspects of wealth and rightful endowment. The pairing strongly conveys the totality of what was withheld.
• left for us in our father’s house?” (בֵּית אָב - beit av):
  • In our father’s house: This phrase refers to the household, extended family, and the patriarchal authority structure where they grew up. A "father's house" was traditionally the source of security, honor, and provision. The rhetorical question here starkly exposes Laban's failure in this fundamental duty.
  • Words-group: “Is there still any portion or inheritance left for us in our father’s house?”: This rhetorical question serves as a powerful affirmation of their shared experience of exploitation and abandonment by Laban. It conveys a complete lack of future prospect or financial security from their father. It emphasizes Laban's avarice, as he had effectively "sold" them for a bride-price which he then consumed, leaving them destitute of their due. Their agreement removes any hesitation Jacob might have had regarding the family's departure from Laban’s domain.

Commentary

Genesis 31:14 is a critical verse, marking Rachel and Leah's full commitment to Jacob’s plan of departure. Their rhetorical question about the absence of "portion" or "inheritance" from Laban is not a mere inquiry but a vehement assertion of his egregious exploitation. Laban had deprived them of the traditional financial security, their marriage dues (implied dowry), and any future share in his vast wealth. This injustice solidified their resentment against their own father, forming a strong unified front with Jacob against Laban's manipulative behavior. The verse powerfully underscores God's providential care for Jacob's family, ensuring they would break free from an oppressive situation, even when family ties were corrupted by greed. It highlights the divine justice that allows the exploited to claim their rightful blessings, often against the desires of human oppressors.

Bonus section

• This verse illustrates Rachel and Leah's newfound assertiveness and independence, moving beyond the patriarchal confines that oppressed them.
• It serves as a counterpoint to the cultural norm where daughters found security and standing through their paternal lineage. Laban’s actions demonstrate a fundamental breach of this cultural expectation.
• The solidarity among Jacob, Rachel, and Leah, founded on their shared suffering and belief in God’s intervention, is a crucial element for their journey to the promised land.

Explore genesis 31 images, wallpapers, art, audio, video, maps, infographics and timelines